Many People have watched in horror as Elon Musk, the world’s richest particular person, has been permitted to tear via numerous workplaces of america authorities in latest weeks. Backed by President Donald Trump, and supported by a small team of true believers, he has efficiently laid siege to America’s huge federal forms.
On Tuesday, Trump signed an government order giving Musk even more power. It requires federal companies to cooperate together with his “Division of Authorities Effectivity” (generally known as DOGE) in slicing their staffing ranges and proscribing new hires.
In his first feedback to the media since becoming a member of the Trump administration as a “particular” authorities worker, Musk additionally responded to criticism that he’s launching a “hostile takeover” of the US authorities.
The folks voted for main authorities reform, and that’s what persons are going to get.
Are Musk’s actions akin to a “hostile takeover” of presidency, or a coup? I argue it’s extra a type of “state seize”. Right here’s what meaning.
Why it’s not a coup or self-coup
Beneath the pretence of maximising authorities effectivity and productiveness, DOGE has amassed fairly a little bit of energy. It has:
Musk’s blitzkrieg throughout Washington – carried out in apparent violation of numerous federal laws – has not solely stirred confusion, however defied clarification.
A preferred argument, supported by some historians and commentators, is that Musk’s actions quantity to a coup. They argue this isn’t a coup within the traditional sense of a takeover of the bodily centres of energy. Reasonably, it’s a seizure of digital infrastructure by an unelected group in search of to undo democratic practices and violate human rights.
Alex Wroblewski/EPA
This time period, nevertheless, isn’t technically right. Probably the most extensively accepted definition of a coup is:
an overt try by the navy or different elites throughout the state equipment to unseat the sitting head of state utilizing unconstitutional means.
Since Musk and Trump are bedfellows on this plot, the tech billionaire is clearly not attempting to violently unseat the president.
One other attainable clarification: this can be a self-coup. This describes a state of affairs through which
the sitting nationwide chief takes decisive illegitimate motion towards countervailing establishments and elites to perpetuate the incumbent’s energy.
In December, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol tried a self-coup when he declared martial law in an effort to ostensibly shield the nation from opposition forces. He rapidly reversed his resolution amid elite defections and mass public demonstrations.
Although self-coups have gotten extra frequent, Musk is doing the soiled work within the US – not Trump. Additionally, Musk’s chief goal – the forms – doesn’t nominally offset presidential energy (besides in conspiracy theories).
What’s ‘state seize’?
Extra precisely, Musk’s siege quantities to a type of “state seize”. This refers to:
the appropriation of state assets by political actors for their very own ends: both personal or political.
By this logic, Musk’s goal might be to seize totally different items of the US authorities and switch the state right into a device for wealth extraction.
State seize is a comparatively easy however extraordinarily damaging course of. That is the way it has performed out in nations like Indonesia, Hungary, Nigeria, Russia, Sri Lanka and South Africa (Musk’s birthplace):
First, political and company elites achieve management of formal establishments, info programs and bureaucratic policy-making processes.
Then, they use this energy to use guidelines selectively, make biased choices and allocate assets based mostly on personal pursuits (fairly than the general public good).
In captured states, strongman leaders usually use financial coverage and regulatory choices to reward their political friends. For example, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Russian President Vladimir Putin and former South African President Jacob Zuma have helped their allies by:
- making authorities anti-trust choices
- issuing permits and licenses
- awarding authorities contracts and concessions
- waiving laws or tariffs
- conferring tax exempt standing.
State seize is essentially a predatory course of.

Anna Szilagyi/AP
By taking up how the American authorities does enterprise, Musk might be in search of to complement a small however highly effective community of allies.
The primary beneficiary can be Trump, who isn’t any stranger to utilizing his workplace to develop his household’s enterprise empire. With a extra totally captured state, Trump can take an energetic function in figuring out how public wealth is dispersed amongst company and political elites. This decision-making energy usually goes hand-in-hand with “personalist” regimes, through which all the pieces is a transaction with the chief.
The second beneficiary can be Musk himself and different Silicon Valley mega-billionaires who’ve bent a knee to Trump. By positioning their tech corporations as the answer to what allegedly ails the federal authorities, notably in relation to the use of artificial intelligence, they stand to safe profitable contracts handed out by the “new” state.
The third beneficiary can be the small army of engineers and technicians working with Musk to upend the American authorities. As loyal foot troopers, these people shall be compensated with profession development, monetary beneficial properties and networking alternatives, whereas additionally having fun with authorized impunity. This type of quid professional quo is how authoritarian regimes work.
What this might imply for the US
As Musk continues his assault on the federal forms, the American folks will endure the implications.
Probably the most speedy influence of state seize: worse choices are made. By purging skilled civil servants, cancelling authorities contracts and accessing delicate info programs, Musk’s actions will doubtless degrade the standard of living at home and endanger American lives abroad.
State seize additionally means there can be much less accountability for the Trump administration’s public coverage choices. With a lack of congressional and independent oversight, key choices over the distribution of financial advantages might be made informally behind closed doorways.
Lastly, state seize is inseparable from corruption. Doing enterprise with the US federal authorities might quickly require one to pass a loyalty test fairly than a public curiosity take a look at.
Trump’s enemies will encounter extra hurdles, whereas his allies could have a seat on the desk.